scraps of ideas around software and collaboration

On the speed of decisions slowing down, as companies grow

As companies grow, things sometimes become a lot slower. Not only in terms of execution speed, but also in terms of ambition.

I am not an expert by any means, just outlining my experience so far and some thoughts around this 👇

My theory is that, unless highly driven by the company culture, a lot of the middle management without a high-stake in the company is by default risk-averse.

Risk-aversion is, in a nutshell, a preference for certainty, even when the uncertain path has a higher pay-off.

So, what creates average products? I don't think a lot of companies go out to do something with a bad experience on purpose.

New, innovative ideas present in most cases a high-risk. If good ideas were obvious, we would get everyone competing on executing the innovation vs marginally optimising the existing status-quo.

Who are willing to incur high-risk? Often, the people with also a high reward.

If investing in high-risk stocks would have the same potential return as collecting interest from the banks, people wouldn't be incentivised to invest in them.

So, looking at start-ups specifically, who has a high-reward from an innovative idea that plays out?

Often the founders and early employees, and often a delayed reward (stock).

This can create a weird inconsistency where:

Founders + investors + early employees are incentivised to take big shots because the win can be exponentially bigger than the initial investment

People that joined later, no-stock all cash are incentivised to do a good job at keeping their job.

This means not rocking the boat, optimising what's already working and hitting the targets.

If I do a well-enough job or fantastic job, unless the incentives are in place to reward me to get out of my way and take a shot at a high-risk idea, all I inherit is the risk.

This ☝️ is not correct if everyone wins from the company winning.

Things that would align the incentives:

  • Bonuses based on the impact of new initiatives
  • A culture heavily focused on rewarding and pushing innovation (Netflix)
  • Profit sharing or stock options

Paraphrasing Thomas Sowell who proposed: "looking at systems in terms of the incentives they create, rather than simply the goals they pursue. This means that consequences matter more than intentions - and not just the immediate consequences."

I don't have a clear solution for a bottoms-up realigning on incentives, as so much is dependent on the leadership.

But when something is slowed down in the decision-making process, looking at what incentives every person in the decision chain has vs the job description can hopefully bring more clarity.

Subscribe to tibi iorga

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson